"Improving refugee screening capacity, strictness"        

On 5 February, civil society groups issued a statement in front of the Government's Gogawa Government Complex, "Calling for the closure of the source of fake refugees in the Amendment to the Refugee Law of the Ministry of Justice" (c) religion and truth

On 5 February, in front of the Government's Gocheon Government complex, civil society groups such as the National Refugee Response issued a statement saying: 'The Ministry of Legal Affairs' amendments to the Refugee Act should be supported to prevent the source of fake refugees. ''

The Ministry of Legal Affairs has until 8 February to publicly consult the community on the various amendments to the Refugee Act.

The Amendment of the Ministry of Legal Affairs appears to be aimed at fundamentally eliminating the reasons for the surge in false refugee applicants, as the number of refugee applicants increases every year, taking advantage of the blind spots of existing refugee law.

        "No substantive change can be reapplyed to prevent abuse"

On 5 February, civil society organizations issued a statement in front of the Government's Gogawa Government Complex, "Blocking the Sources of Fake Refugees in the Amendment to the Refugee Law of the Ministry of Legal Affairs" (c) religion and truth

In the current Refugee Act, the Ministry of Legal Affairs does not impose restrictions on the application of abuse of re-applications or for no apparent reason, which delays the screening process for refugee status and thus impedes the screening of genuine refugees. Questions raised so far, such as re-applications without changes and applications for no apparent reason.

As a result, the refugee application process can be implemented quickly and effectively, thus avoiding duplicate appeals procedures (reapplying) for long-term residence and allowing administrative proceedings only prior to the second trial. Supreme Court.

At the same time, even refugee applicants who have been found to be ineligible have stayed for long periods of time as a result of opposition and administrative proceedings, and there have been many cases of abuse of domestic refugee law, which have made it difficult for refugees to be screened for abuse of reapply.

        Finally, repeat the lawsuit.

On February 5th, in front of the government building in Gocheon, civil society groups staged a protest "calling for a ban on refugee applications from Almighty Gods"

Among them, a large number of Chinese pseudo-religious " Almighty Gods" members applied for fake refugees and disrupted the domestic refugee order, which played an important role in this revision.

That day, a demonstration was held in front of the Ministry of Legal Affairs, where demonstrators said, "Cancel CAG's domestic refugee application!" ”

        "Prohibition of abuse of the Refugee Act"

On February 5th, in front of the government building in Gocheon, civil society groups staged a protest "calling for a ban on refugee applications from Almighty Gods"

It was to be hoped that genuine and fake refugees (economic purposes, long-term residence, missionary purposes) would be quickly separated, that those who were not refugees would be expeled from Korea expedite, and that future administrative proceedings against refugee applicants should be prevented if they were found to be ineligible. Only in this way can this be the path to the correct implementation of refugee law.